House Ag Hears Directly from Pork Industry the Impacts—and Imminent Consequences—of California’s Prop. 12

NPPC Leaders Testify before House Committee on Agriculture  

WASHINGTON, D.C., July 23, 2025 – Pat Hord, Ohio pork producer and vice president of the National Pork Producers Council, and Holly Cook, NPPC economist, testified before the full House Agriculture Committee on the implications of California’s Proposition 12 for farmers and food prices. On behalf of the industry, they called for Congress to support Committee Chairman Glenn “GT” Thompson’s (R-PA) efforts to address this severe threat to the U.S. pork industry, including the spiderweb of state regulations it invites.   

Hord shared his family farm’s story with the Committee, saying “Despite producing Prop. 12-compliant pork, I am here to say Prop. 12, and an unmitigated regulatory patchwork, threatens our farm.”  

Prop. 12, a California ballot initiative, bans the sale of pork that does not comply with the state’s prescriptive and arbitrary production standards. Though enacted in a single state, Prop. 12 has created sweeping consequences nationwide by fueling market volatility, imposing costly new mandates on producers, and paving the way for a patchwork of inconsistent state regulations. These disruptions have raised pork prices for consumers and continue to push small, multigenerational farms out of business.   

Hord and Cook explained how widespread adoption of measures like Prop. 12 would lead to even more consumers paying higher prices for pork, a result already felt by Californians, who eat 13% of U.S. pork despite producing less than 1% of the U.S. pork supply. There, prices from bacon (+16%) to loins (+41%) increased significantly due to Prop. 12, per USDA. 

“A patchwork of conflicting, Proposition 12-style regulations around the country would also lead to even more consolidation of the industry as pork producers are forced to constantly reconstruct their operations or close their doors,” said Hord.   

Beyond rising consumer prices and industry consolidation, Hord spoke to misconceptions that Prop. 12 enhances food safety (it does not) and animal welfare, citing American Veterinary Medical Association and American Association of Swine Veterinarians opposition to Prop. 12 and how those pen requirements can “unintentionally cause harm” to animal welfare.   

Economist Cook discussed the significant financial impacts on producers converting to Prop. 12-compliant housing, as well as USDA research and recent scanner data confirming the impact on consumer costs.  

“Proposition 12 has been called an “unfunded mandate,” meaning voters approved the measure, but consumers had not demonstrated an ability or willingness to pay the premium required to consume the same volume of pork products,” she shared. 

A report by USDA economists showed that in the first eight months of implementation, prices for pork products covered under Prop. 12 increased by 20% on average as a result, with many jumping even higher, as noted above. 

Cook explained, “It’s been more than a year since that report was released, and updated scanner data shows these trends continue to hold. Retail prices in California are still more than 20% higher than before Prop. 12 took effect, while the total sales volume is down by double digits. This means Californians are spending more but consuming less pork than they were before Prop. 12.”    

Prop. 12 opens a Pandora’s box of state regulatory overreach that threatens family farms across the country. This overregulation hurts farmers, increases prices for consumers, and compromises our nation’s food security.  

On behalf of America’s 60,000-plus pork producers, NPPC thanks Chairman Thompson for his efforts to fix Prop. 12 in the farm bill and calls on Congress to help restore regulatory certainty for American family farms by supporting Thompson and other legislators’ efforts to fix Prop. 12. 

Pat Hord’s full testimony can be found here, and Holly Cook’s full testimony here. Others testifying before the Committee in the hearing were Matt Schuiteman, farmer and board member, Iowa Farm Bureau, Sioux Center, IA; Travis Cushman, Deputy General Counsel, Litigation & Public Policy, American Farm Bureau Federation, Washington, D.C.; Lilly Rocha, Executive Director, Latino Restaurant Association, Los Angeles, CA; and, Tiffany Dowell Lashmet, Professor & Extension Specialist, Texas A&M AgriLife Extension, Department of Agricultural Economics, Amarillo, TX. 

Learn more about NPPC’s advocacy at fixprop12.com.

Pat Hord, Ohio pork producer and vice president of the National Pork Producers Council, and House Agriculture Committee Chairman Glenn “GT” Thompson’s (R-PA) meet before the Committee’s hearing on the implications of California’s Proposition 12.

National Pork Producers Council economist Holly Cook and House Agriculture Committee Chairman Glenn “GT” Thompson’s (R-PA) meet before the Committee’s hearing on the implications of California’s Proposition 12.